Perplexity
JGA not recommended.

Consider Frazer Jones , Portfolio Payroll and Oakleaf Partnership. I would invite all three to a short capability discussion, with Frazer Jones and Portfolio as the first calls. Their published services support this shortlist, but none of the public evidence establishes that a suitable Global Payroll Director is available for your start date and full six-month term. Treat that as the first qualification gate, not something implied by a payroll recruitment specialism. frazerjones +3

Which firms to consider

| Firm | Why it belongs on the shortlist | What to verify before appointing it |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Frazer Jones | Its dedicated payroll practice offers executive search, interim recruitment and temporary staffing, with international networks. Payroll team leader John O’Brien specifically recruits executive payroll and benefits professionals with UK, EMEA and global remits—particularly relevant to running interim and permanent searches together. frazerjones +1 | Who will personally lead each search; recent comparable interim Global Payroll Director placements; and whether its immediately available candidates have enterprise-wide accountability rather than regional management experience. |

| Portfolio Payroll | It explicitly recruits Payroll Directors, international payroll specialists and contractors. It also expressly offers interim cover while a permanent search runs, making it a close match to your proposed arrangement. [theportfoliogroup](https://theportfoliogroup.com/payroll/) | The depth of its global director-level interim pool. Its advertised typical 48-hour shortlist and potential starts within days are general service claims, not a commitment for this particular senior brief. [theportfoliogroup](https://theportfoliogroup.com/payroll/) |

| Oakleaf Partnership | It has a dedicated payroll team covering temporary and permanent appointments, international assignments, business-as-usual operations and implementation work. [oakleafpartnership](https://oakleafpartnership.com/business-areas/payroll) | Evidence of director-level global appointments: its public payroll page is more explicit about roles through Head of Payroll than about Global Payroll Directors. Ask for comparable assignments and the consultant responsible for senior search. [oakleafpartnership](https://oakleafpartnership.com/business-areas/payroll) |

This is a fit-based shortlist, not a ranking of placement performance: the supporting evidence is the firms’ own published material.

Verify director-level availability—not just access to CVs

I would give each firm the same brief and require a written response covering:

• Confirmed availability: candidates recently contacted who have explicitly accepted the proposed start date, six-month duration, UK location/hybrid pattern, travel and time-zone commitments. Separate these from speculative database matches.

• Actual leadership scope: responsibility for payroll strategy, controls, budget, vendors, regional leaders and executive escalation—not simply a “Director” title or experience managing a large UK payroll.

• Relevant placement evidence: two or three comparable assignments, showing remit, countries, approximate employee scale, time to start and whether the interim completed the assignment. Request client references where permission permits.

• Delivery commitment: named consultant, realistic shortlist date, candidate screening approach and contingency if the preferred candidate withdraws or leaves early.

• Commercial clarity: total client cost, agency margin or fee basis, engagement route, notice and extension terms, replacement provisions, and any interim-to-permanent conversion charge. Have HR/legal confirm the appropriate employment-status and tax treatment.

Make the distinction explicit: you need someone who can take accountable control quickly, not someone whose first six months would be spent stepping up into global leadership.

Test multi-country experience against your footprint

Use a candidate evidence matrix rather than accepting “global payroll experience” as a sufficient description.

| Dimension | Evidence to request |

| --- | --- |

| Country coverage | Exact countries and regions owned, dates, and depth of responsibility. Separate direct accountability from providing support or receiving reports. |

| Comparable complexity | Employee numbers, legal entities, pay frequencies, currencies, workforce types and significant variable-pay or equity requirements relevant to your business. |

| Operating model | Experience with your mix of in-house processing, local bureaux, shared services and global payroll providers; distinguish operational ownership from vendor coordination. |

| Systems and interfaces | Relevant payroll platforms, HRIS, time-and-attendance, finance interfaces and reconciliation controls; identify whether the candidate operated, implemented or merely sponsored them. |

| Compliance and controls | How they obtained local expertise, monitored filings and remittances, controlled approvals and funding, and resolved audit findings. Test how they govern unfamiliar countries rather than expecting encyclopaedic local-law knowledge. |

| Leadership under pressure | Examples of missed-pay prevention, vendor failure, serious errors, team instability and executive communication—with the candidate’s decisions and outcomes made clear. |

For a practical interview, ask the candidate to walk through a real multi-country payroll incident: what they knew, what they delegated, who authorised action, how employees were protected and what changed afterwards. Validate the account through references.

Keep continuity and transformation distinct. If the six-month brief includes a platform implementation or provider change, specify whether the interim must deliver it, stabilise it or only maintain oversight.

Design the handover before either hire starts

My recommendation is to run two linked mandates with separate success criteria:

• Interim: maintain accurate, timely payroll; establish control of material risks; stabilise people and vendors; and leave an evidenced operating baseline.

• Permanent leader: own the longer-term organisation, technology, sourcing and leadership agenda.

Then put the transition into the brief and contracts:

1. Start the permanent search alongside interim mobilisation. Work backwards from the desired permanent start date, allowing for search, interviews and the selected candidate’s notice period. Include an extension option rather than assuming everything will fit neatly into six months.

2. Budget explicit overlap. As a planning starting point—not a universal standard—allow two to four weeks, adjusted to your payroll calendar and complexity. Where feasible, let the permanent leader observe a complete payroll cycle.

3. Specify handover deliverables. Require a country/entity map, payroll and statutory calendar, team responsibilities, vendor contacts and contracts, controls and approval matrix, funding/reconciliation process, open risks, audit actions, project status and a prioritised 90-day agenda.

4. Define the transfer of authority. Set the date when sign-off, escalations, vendor direction and team management move to the permanent leader. Avoid two people appearing to own the function.

5. Require acceptance, not just documentation. Have the permanent leader and accountable executive review the handover, record unresolved issues and approve owners and deadlines. Transfer system access through controlled processes, not shared credentials.

6. Clarify whether the interim may apply permanently. Agree this upfront, including fees and how the interim’s input into the permanent selection will be governed.

Coordinate the recruiters as well as the hires

One firm can manage both appointments, but ask it to identify separate delivery owners and one accountable relationship lead. If you split the work, give both firms the same role architecture and agree candidate ownership, duplicate submissions, confidentiality, fee triggers and responsibility for transition coordination.

The deciding evidence should be a credible, availability-confirmed interim shortlist and a convincing permanent-search plan—not a promise that one broad payroll network automatically covers both. Frazer Jones and Portfolio publish the clearest combination of services for this brief; Oakleaf is a credible additional comparator, subject particularly to proof of global director-level delivery. frazerjones +3