C02 / Update existing guide

Confidential payroll leadership search: the checks before candidate approaches

Build on the existing confidential-search guide with JGA-specific evidence: a disclosure-gate template, a conflicts/off-limits discussion and an anonymised mandate. Make it easier for an employer to evaluate the process before authorising approaches.

Buyer
CFO, CHRO or senior talent leader selecting a confidential search partner
Market and remit
UK-based Global Payroll Director with an international remit
Language
English (UK)
Buyer decision
Evaluate a discreet search process and agree disclosure boundaries.
Format
Focused update and a downloadable search-governance worksheet
Suggested owner
Relevant UK payroll practice lead with the marketing editor

Build on the existing content

The 20 October guide already explains discretion, market mapping and assessment. Keep the URL and current useful coverage; add practical artefacts and an identifiable practice owner.

Update this existing page

Keep the current URL.

Open the existing JGA article

Brief the writer

  1. Record who may know the employer identity and when it can be disclosed.
  2. Show how the practice discusses conflicts, off-limits organisations and candidate permission.
  3. Explain the mandate-specific criteria behind market mapping.
  4. Show what an anonymised shortlist rationale looks like.
  5. Add one approved confidential-search example and a named consultation route.

The original asset to add

A redacted disclosure-gate and search-governance worksheet reflecting JGA’s real process.

Evidence to gather

  • Practice lead sign-off on actual confidentiality and conflicts procedures.
  • Client permission for an anonymised comparable leadership mandate.

Keep the scope focused

Do not publish a second generic confidentiality explainer or present a sample protocol as an existing JGA policy.

Completion check

The buyer can complete the named decision or worksheet and reach the correct employer enquiry route. Record enquiries by role and geography, then compare the mapped locked questions in a separately dated follow-up.

Research behind this brief